A shocking series of racist emails attacking job applicant Julie Eru on the North Shore, which have been traced back to a Chinese-run company called Brightstar, has been exposed on 3 News.
It was generally agreed by Brightstar that their computers had been hacked and a police report has been filed.
The boss of Brightstar has limited English so we can easily rule him out as being the writer of these messages, which point to a native English speaker.
The question was raised in the report, ‘But why would
a hacker attack a small business in East Tamaki?’
I would have thought the answer very easy. The hacker is a racist.
I said not too long ago on the blogosphere that those who make accusations of racism so readily, as the writer of these offensive emails does, are usually racists themselves.
Their motivation is to make an immigrant, in this case, Chinese, company look bad, and to create a rift between Chinese and Māori.
It was a failed attempt, trying to revive the sort of irrelevant muck that yesterday’s politician, Winston Peters, specialized in.
It’s less disgusting than the attempts by racist groups some years ago of simultaneously desecrating Jewish gravestones and sending pork to Muslim families, but the ideas are similar.
That time, we could rule out the perpetrators being Jewish or Islamic; this time, we can rule out the hacker being either Chinese or Māori.
That time, too, it brought Jews and Muslims closer together in New Zealand; this time, I can only hope that both Chinese and Māori, who have both experienced racism, either as immigrants or in our own homeland, can come closer together, too.
Comments
However, in America we just had our African American president inflame relations between African Americans and European Americans by chastising an European American policeman and an entire police Dept, on prime time news, for arresting an African American professor.
Later he backtracked, after our President realized that his statements were highly inflammatory. The lesson here is, even the most polished individuals can let their emotions trump their common sense.
Hi Jack,
I wonder if the above comment implies that America's President is a racist?
Hi Jack,
Timothy and I are buddys as you know - thought it respectful to seek your opinion on the subject, it is your blog. Pres Obama should have utilized a different tone. I fully accept that. He took it personal, and that's not his public role, maybe?
However, the story takes a turn as we learned today...the story stands in conflict with the 911 caller: Contrary to Cambridge Mass police report Caller never spoke to police. http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/07/27/gates.arrest/index.html
And: Mayor Of Cambridge Mass " Arrest should not have happened" http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/07/23/gates.arrest.mayor/index.html
It becomes another one of those.. big misunderstandings; where people of color are uber sensitive, trapped by their own experiences in an era long gone; or is that even true, in context?
And in all fairness to Timothy, the full story may never be presented. We (America) can not move back to civil rights, hence - branded media must present honest news, facts and full stories. That's sustainable!
I feel, that in 2009 we (as an American collective) can never say race is the problem again, if we accept the strides we've made as one United States of America. That's a mighty tough posture to stand in!
And that implies multiculturalism. Random House Unabridged Dictionary | Multiculturalism: Preservation of different cultures and cultural IDs within a unified society (1960-65)
Thanks for making it all clear.
Best,
Bill
I agree that in 2009 it is far harder to blame race as a problem, for the very reason you state.
VP Biden is a whole different story;)